Tom Russell - Portfolio
Liquid engine CAD model

Overview

Liquid Rocket Engine Project

Personal project developing a liquid engine from scratch using a completely custom valve, tank and chamber design machined and tested by me.

Scope

Key Characteristics

Hotfire results: 2562 Ns total impulse, 611 N peak thrust and 85%+ C* efficiency. An outstanding outcome for a UC valve design, with instant clean ignition and a smooth burn profile.

Demonstrated Performance

611 N peak thrust, 2562 Ns total impulse. Upgraded from predicted K-class to L-class motor due to exceeding performance expectations.

Simulation Informed Design

Engine components sized using thermodynamic simulation, injector designed using simulation data and literature with momentum balance. Simulation tuning gave 85%+ C* efficiency.

Floating Piston & Concentric Tanks

Concentric oxidiser and fuel tubes with a floating piston separation. Nitrous oxide used to pressurise the IPA.

Hotfire exhaust Fitted thrust curve

Design Overview

Concentric tank and floating piston

The engine uses a concentric tank geometry with a 48 mm inner oxidiser tube and a 76.2 mm outer fuel tube. A floating piston separates the nitrous oxide from the fuel and maintains a pressure on the fuel from the nitrous.

Concentric tanks allowed for simplified valve design, makes for a floating piston less likely to cam and doesnt required an extra line to bring either the fuel or oxidiser from the top tank which is needed in a stacked tank design. The design also accommodates stock circularity variance through generous O-ring cross-sections, making the sealed assembly forgiving to the measured 0.2 mm ID variation in the tube stock.

Valve design

The valve is based on a UC style valve, extended to support both oxidiser and fuel actuation using just the oxidiser fill tube. This approach preserves the compatibility of a classic burn-through hybrid UC while adding a true pintle injector and an independent check valve to regain ignition timing control.

Using the dump function on the ground support equipment, the valve can now be actuated without relying on uncontrolled burn through. That removes the two biggest UC drawbacks, poor timing control and lack of true injector integration.

Valve cross section

Valve geometry

Cross-section detail shows the oxidiser and fuel paths, pintle profile, and sealing interfaces.

Injector development

The injector is a pintle injector with an outer fuel annulus and an inner oxidiser pintle. Injector geometry was chosen to match target OF ratio and momentum ratios. The CdA values determined from the model and water testing of the 3D printed injectors were used to size the effective areas of the injector elements.

Initial sizing and testing produced a fuel injector area of approximately 2.03 mm² and an oxidiser area of 20.34 mm², with discharge coefficients of 0.8 for fuel and 0.4 for oxidiser. These values were iterated through modelling and flow testing to support the expected 0.35 kg/s total massflow.

Valve motion

Animation directly illustrates the valve actuation and the transition between open and closed states with flow paths.

Valve open state

Valve open state

The open position occurs when the fill line is dumped, pressure on the underside of the piston drops to atmospheric and the excess pressure on top of the piston allows it to be actuated open.

Valve closed state

Valve closed state

In the closed state the unequal area of the valve piston exposed to the nitrous pressure ensures there is a net force holding the piston up.

Injector testing and characterisation

Testing began with 3D printed injector prototypes to verify flow rates and spray geometry. Separate inner and outer flow measurements were taken with different prints, and the data was used to derive empirical Cd values for fuel and oxidiser.

Water tests validated the injector performance, including spray angle and flow distribution. The test programme also aims to establish a correlation between 3D printed and machined injector behaviour with testing to take place soon, machined components have just been finished.

Water injector testing

Water validation

Water testing captured spray formation and helped refine the injector's discharge coefficients.

Manufacturing

All components were manufactured on manual lathes and mills from local tube stock and billet. Radial bolts are shoulder bolts, matched drilled with bushings and designed to NASA 5020b standards for bolted joints.

An aft thread on the engine assembly lets internal components be compressed to manage axial tolerance and reduces the need for extremely tight axial fits. This thread preload strategy and generous O-ring seals support manufacturability and ease of assembly.

Engine assembly Machined parts assembly fitment

Finished hardware

Valve, injector and hydro/cold flow tank components.

Machined component layout

Finished valve

Completed main valve assembly.

Lathe machining of tank stock

Lathe work

Manual turning for the inner concentric tank.

Hydrostatic test campaign

A hydrostatic test campaign was completed on the full-scale valve and injector assembly with a sub-scale tank, validating leak-tightness and structural strength under pressure, as well as confirming valve actuation. All objectives were met, clearing the path for full-scale tank testing to begin.

Hydrostatic test setup

Hydrostatic test

Hydrostatic test of the full-scale valve and injector assembly with sub-scale tanks.

Cold gas testing

A cold gas test campaign was conducted as a full wet dress rehearsal of the system, validating the assembly under representative conditions before proceeding to hot fire.

Cold gas test

Cold gas test of the full assembly using nitrous oxide.

Pressure vs time during cold gas test

Test data

Pressure data from the cold gas test.

Hotfire Results

The engine significantly overperformed initial predictions, delivering 2562 Ns total impulse and upgrading the classification from K357 to L-class. The model assumed 65% C* efficiency but the data shows 85%+, an excellent result for a UC valve engine. Ignition was instant and clean. A visible step in the thrust curve around 3.8 s shows the IPA running out before the N2O, so the O/F ratio needs tuning. These results are extremely promising and I am looking forward to iterating on the design.

30 June 2026 hotfire

Hotfire exhaust

Exhaust plume

Simulation Fit

Tuning tank pressure to 40 bar and C* efficiency to 85%+ produced a simulated thrust curve that closely tracks the measured data.

Fitted thrust curve

Thrust

Fitted pressure curve

Pressure

Fitted mass flow curve

Mass flow

Performance Summary

Total Measured Impulse2562 Ns
Motor ClassificationL-Class (up from K, just)
Measured Specific Impulse (Isp)~188 s
Measured Peak Thrust611 N
Propellant Mass1.39 kg (1.15 kg N2O, 0.24 kg IPA)
Average O/F Ratio4.89